Social Department's move to shift 28 children under
state's protection from Khanpur Protection Home without proper arrangements
attracts criticism from child rights activists
The Social Justice and Empowerment Department has
been left red-faced after its attempt to right a wrong backfired. Taking into
account last month's CAG report which pointed out several irregularities in the
child protection services, the department ordered the Khanpur Observation Home
to shift 28 children, in need of protection, to another centre. The idea was to
separate these children from those who have a criminal record or past. However,
the hasti ly taken decision has landed the department in hot water after the
protection home failed to find a safe place for the 28 children to stay.
According to the Juvenile Justice Act, children who
are in need of protection and those in conflict with the law cannot be kept on
the same premises. However, the Khanpur Observation Home violated this act.
“The home authorities and several child rights
activists repeatedly wrote to the department about the matter but no steps were
taken. It was only after the CAG report was declared that they made a move to
rectify the situation,“ sources said. “How can anyone keep innocent kids and
those with a juvenile record under the same roof? Children in need of care need
better support and surveillance. But they are also vulnerable and need to be
kept away from questionable influence,“ said Dilip Mer, head of state Childline.
On April 8, the home in Khanpur received an order
from the department for the immediate transfer of 28 children who were under
the state's protection. Unfortunately, there are no other government-run
juvenile homes in the city and the ones run my NGOs refused to take in the
kids, sources said.Finally, a trust-run juvenile home Bhatia Home took in
the children.
Child right activists have criticised the
government's sudden order to shift the children without proper plans.
Additional Chief Secretary of the department MS Dagur claimed that he was not
aware of the matter. “I will look into it and get back to you,“ he said.
Meanwhile, Rameshwari Pandya, chairperson of Gujarat State Commission for
Protection of Child Rights did not respond to our calls.
The superintendent of the protection home claimed
that they did not violate the Act. “They might be on the same premises but they
had different rooms, classrooms, mess timings etc.“ said Mayank Trivedi,
superintendent of the centre.
No comments :
Post a Comment